|                                                                                                          021 0174 UNITED STATES OF AMERICABEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 
  
    | In
        the Matter of NESTLÉ HOLDINGS, INC., a corporation, DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM HOLDINGS, INC., a corporation,
          and
 DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM, INC.,	a corporation.
 | Docket No. C-4082 |  COMPLAINT  Pursuant to the provision of the Federal Trade Commission
    Act and the Clayton Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said
    Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe
that Nestlé Holdings, Inc. ("Nestlé"), Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Holdings, Inc., and Dreyer's Grand
Ice Cream, Inc. (Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Holdings, Inc., and Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc., are
hereinafter referred to as "Dreyer's"), have entered into an agreement in violation of Section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and that the terms of such agreement,
were they to be implemented, would result in a violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission
Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and it
appearing to the Commission that a proceeding in respect thereof would be in
the public interest, hereby issues its
complaint, stating its charges as follows: I.     Respondent Nestle 1. Respondent Nestlé Holdings Inc., is a corporation organized and
    existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place
    of business at 383 Main Avenue, Fifth Floor,
Norwalk, Connecticut  06851.  Nestle Holdings, Inc., is a subsidiary of, and
    controlled by, Nestlé S.A., a corporation organized, existing, and
    doing business under and by virtue of the laws of Switzerland, with its principal
    executive offices located at Avenue Nestlé 55,
CH-1800 Vevey,
Switzerland.2. Respondent Nestlé is, and at all times relevant herein has been,
    among other things, engaged in the production, sales and distribution of
    superpremium ice cream to customers located
throughout the United States.
  3. Respondent Nestlé  and its affiliates, in 2002, had total worldwide
    sales of all products of approximately 89.2 billion Swiss francs and United
    States sales of all products of approximately $
11.8 billion.  Respondent Nestlé and its affiliates, in 2002, had United
States sales of all superpremium ice cream products of approximately $ 340 million.
Nestlé sells superpremium ice cream in the United
States under the Häagen-Dazs brand.
  4. Respondent Nestlé is, and at all times relevant herein has been,
    engaged in commerce, or in activities affecting commerce, within the meaning
    of Section 1 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12,
and Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44.
 Respondent Dreyer's
 
 
 5. Respondent Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc., is a corporation organized,
    existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State
    of Delaware, with its principal place of
business at 5929 College Avenue, Oakland, California  94618. 
  6. Respondent Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Holdings, Inc., is a corporation
    organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of
    the State of
    Delaware, with its principal place of business at 5929 College Avenue, Oakland,
    California 94618. Respondent Dreyer's Grand
Ice Cream Holdings, Inc., as a result of the transaction, will be the parent
    of Respondent Dreyer's
Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
  7. Respondent Dreyer's is, and at all times relevant herein has been, among
    other things, engaged in the production, sales, and distribution of superpremium
    ice cream to customers located
throughout the United States.
  8. Respondent Dreyer's, in 2002, had total worldwide sales of all products
    of approximately $ 1.3 billion, and United States sales of all products of
    approximately $ 1.3 billion. 
Respondent Dreyer's, in 2002, had United States sales of all superpremium ice
    cream products of approximately $ 108 million. Dreyer's sells superpremium
    ice cream in the United States under the
Dreamery, Godiva, and Starbucks brands.  Dreyer's planned to introduce a new
    superpremium ice cream in the United States through its joint venture with
    Mars, Incorporated.
  9. Respondent Dreyer's is, and at all times relevant herein has been, engaged
    in commerce , or in activities affecting commerce, within the meaning of
    Section 1 of the Clayton Act, 15
U.S.C. § 12 and Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44. 
  
    III.     The Proposed Acquisition
  
  10. On or about June 16, 2002, Respondents Nestlé and Dreyer's executed
    an agreement
for Respondents Nestlé and Dreyer's to combine their ice cream businesses.
The value of the
proposed acquisition is approximately $2.8 billion. 
  
    IV.     The Relevant Product Market 
  
  11. The relevant product market in which it is appropriate to assess the
    effects of the proposed acquisition is the sale of superpremium ice cream
    products
    to the retail channel because,
  inter alia: 
    12. Total United States sales (at retail) of all superpremium ice cream
    products are approximately $ 604.7 million. The parties sell superpremium
    ice cream
    products through different
retail channels of distribution, including supermarkets, mass merchants, club
    stores, and convenience
stores.		(a)     superpremium ice cream contains more butterfat and less air than premium or
    economy ice creams; 		(b)     superpremium ice cream contains more expensive and higher quality ingredients
    than premium or economy ice creams; and  (c)     superpremium ice cream is priced significantly
        higher than premium or economy
    ice creams. 		V.     The Relevant Geographic Market
  
  13. The relevant geographic market in which it is appropriate to assess
    the effects of the Acquisition in the relevant line of commerce is the United
    States or a narrow region therein.
  
  
    VI.     Concentration
  
  14. The relevant market is highly concentrated and the proposed acquisition,
    if
consummated, will substantially increase that concentration, as follows: 
    VII.     Conditions of Entry
  15. Entry into the relevant market would not be likely, or sufficient to
    prevent the
anticompetitive effects in the relevant market because, inter alia, (a)     In the superpremium ice cream market, Nestlé has
          approximately a 36.5% share (in dollars) across all channels. Dreyer's
          has approximately a 19.1% share (in dollars) across all
    channels. 		(b)     After the acquisition, Respondents will have a market share of approximately
    55.6% (in dollars) of the superpremium ice cream market identified in paragraphs 12 and 13 above. 		(c)     The acquisition raises the HHI from 3,501 to 4,897, an increase of 1,396 points. 
    VIII.     Violations Charged
  16. Nestlé and Dreyer's compete in the sale of superpremium ice
    cream in the United
States.
  17. The effect of the proposed acquisition, if consummated, may be to substantially
    lessen competition in the sale of superpremium ice cream in the United States
    in violation of Section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the Clayton
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, in
the following ways, among others:		(a)     an entrant with a new or unknown brand is unlikely to successfully take a
    sufficient amount of sales from superpremium ice cream incumbents to remain profitable; and 		(b)     a superpremium ice cream entrant would face great difficulty developing a
    nationwide Direct Store Delivery network comparable to either of the merging parties.   
    IX.     Illegal Acquisition
  18. The Agreement entered into between Respondents Nestlé and Dreyer's
    to  combine their ice cream businesses constitutes a violation of Section
    5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18. (a)     by eliminating direct competition in the
          sale of superpremium ice cream between
    Nestlé and Dreyer's; 		(b)     by eliminating Dreyer's as an important competitive constraint in the relevant
    market, e.g., when Dreyer's expanded into superpremium ice cream in 1999, the price of other
    superpremium ice creams decreased significantly;  (c)     by increasing the likelihood that the combination
        of Nestlé and Dreyer's will
    unilaterally exercise market power; and 		(d)     by increasing the likelihood of, or facilitation of, collusion or coordinated
  interaction; each of which increases the likelihood that prices will be higher with the acquisition than they
  would be absent the acquisition.     	WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, THE
      Federal Trade Commission on this twenty-fifth day of June, 2003, issues
      its Complaint against Respondents Nestlé and Dreyer's.  	By the Commission. 							C. Landis PlummerActing Secretary
 SEAL: |