The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20260212: The Resolute Fund VI, L.P.; Javelin Holdco, LLC
20260213: Littelfuse, Inc.; Basler Holdings, LLC
20260214: Littlejohn Fund VI, L.P.; Pareto Efficient Solutions, LLC
20260217: Novo Nordisk Foundation; Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
20260227: Stewart Information Services Corporation; Lender MCS Holdings, Inc.
20260229: Greencore Group plc; Bakkavor Group Plc
20260230: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Astria Therapeutics, Inc.
20260231: Runway Growth Finance Corp.; Double Black Diamond Offshore, Ltd.
20260233: GE Vernova Inc.; Xignux, S.A. de C.V.
20260234: Macquarie Group Limited; TRF IV 2020 (Unblocked), L.P.
20260238: LLCP Lower Middle Market Fund III, L.P.; USA Industries Holdings, LLC
Greystar et al., FTC and Colorado v.
The Federal Trade Commission and the State of Colorado are taking action against Greystar, the nation’s largest multi-family rental property manager, for deceiving consumers about monthly rent costs by tacking on numerous mandatory fees on top of advertised prices.
According to the complaint filed by the FTC and Colorado, these hidden fees have cost consumers living in Greystar properties hundreds of millions of dollars since at least 2019, and consumers often have not discovered the fees until after they have signed a lease or moved in.
Greystar agreed to pay $23 million to the FTC and $1 million to the State of Colorado to resolve the allegations.
Facebook, Inc., FTC v. (FTC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.)
The Federal Trade Commission has sued Facebook, alleging that the company is illegally maintaining its personal social networking monopoly through a years-long course of anticompetitive conduct. The complaint alleges that Facebook has engaged in a systematic strategy—including its 2012 acquisition of up-and-coming rival Instagram, its 2014 acquisition of the mobile messaging app WhatsApp, and the imposition of anticompetitive conditions on software developers—to eliminate threats to its monopoly. The Commission vote to authorize staff to file for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia was 3-2. Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson voted no.
Avast
The FTC will require Avast to pay $16.5 million and prohibit the company from selling or licensing any web browsing data for advertising purposes to settle charges that the company and its subsidiaries sold such information to third parties after promising that its products would protect consumers from online tracking.
The Federal Trade Commission is sending claim forms to consumers who bought deceptively marketed antivirus software from Avast.
Gateway Pet Memorial Services
The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against Gateway Services and its subsidiary Gateway US Holdings, Inc., (collectively referred to as Gateway), which alleges that Gateway imposed noncompete agreements on almost all of its employees, which typically prohibited employees from working in the pet cremation service industry anywhere in the U.S. for one year after leaving Gateway.
Under a proposed FTC consent order, Gateway must, among other terms, immediately stop enforcing all existing noncompete agreements.
On November 25, 2025, the FTC finalized the consent order in this matter.