The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
2507006 Informal Interpretation
Evoke Wellness, LLC., FTC v.
In January 2025, the FTC sued Florida-based Evoke Wellness, LLC and Evoke Health Care Management and their officers Jonathan Mosley and James Hull for using a combination of deceptive Google search ads and telemarketing to masquerade as other substance use disorder treatment providers. The FTC announced the settlement of the case in June 2025, with the defendants being barred from the deceptive conduct and agreeing to pay a $1.9 million civil penalty.
20251381: Tikehau Alliance 2 Fund SLP; Leon Black
20251397: Acrisure Holdings, Inc.; Global Payments Inc.
20251402: Olympus Water Holdings I, L.P.; Ranger Holding LLC
20251407: ACG Parent Holdings, LP; Arrow Management Holdings, LLC
20251412: TA XV-B, L.P.; HealthMark Holdings, LLC
20251413: Gridiron Capital Fund V, L.P.; Greenix Investments, LLC
20251414: Citation Fund I LP; GML Holdings L.L.C.
20251423: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.; Ray Waddell
20251425: Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Carl C. Icahn
20251429: Griffon Topco, LP; Layerzero Power Systems, Inc.
20251433: KKR Management LLP; Michael Marhofer
20251454: HEICO Corporation; Andrew M. Jackson
20251456: Hoshizaki Corporation; Mason Wells Buyout Fund IV, LP
2507001 Informal Interpretation
Roca Labs, Inc.
The FTC took action against the Florida-based marketers of a line of weight-loss supplements who allegedly made baseless claims for their products, and then threatened to enforce “gag clause” provisions against consumers to stop them from posting negative reviews and testimonials online. In September 2018, a federal district court ruled in the FTC’s favor, issuing a summary judgment against the defendants, and in July 2025 the Commission announced it was returning more than $409,000 to defrauded consumers.