Legal Library: Search

Your letter is too vague. It should be fact specific. I need more details in order to give a definitive answer. Discussed comments about this letter with (redacted) on 9/26/91 [note 1- Premerger...

9/24/91 (redacted) called. No time crunch on matter. Will obtain response to anyquestions and write new letter to me. RBS [note 1: Premerger NotificationOffices]

9/13/91-Advised (redacted) that letter had been reviewed by PMN staff and it was in agreement that Company Bs agreement with X did not pass beneficial ownership of the 13% of As voting stock to B...

9-12-91 Called-If the assets previously filed for are the same and the only assets of the partnership then no new filling needed. If partnership has other assets not previously filed for then a new...

09/06/91-agree w/ the conclusion herein

None noted

None noted

None noted

None noted

On 8/21/91-I advised (redacted) that her 8/21 letter to me was troublesome to the PMN Office. The continuum theory is based upon there being a contract betweenA and B and, for whatever reason, the...

Called (redacted) 8/20/91-I concur with this letter after confirming that the REIT is subject to IRS tax limitations

8/13/91-John Sipple says no filing required but questions raised are somewhatdifficult. However, since Bank A is not selling all, or substantially all, of its creditcard accounts in a given geographic...

8/12/91-Advised (redacted) that formation of a bona fide partnership is not negotiable under 801.40. Viewing this as a purchase of an interest in non-productive real estate, the transaction is also...

I concur PS-called 8-12-91

I concur PS-called 8-12-91

OK-08/09/91 JK